Books Don’t Have to Be Perfect
Sunday, March 15th, 2009I mean, any book you write should be great, but it doesn’t have to be perfect. That’s arguably the biggest hang-up that stops people from putting a book out there in the world. “It has to be perfect, and then I’ll publish it.” Well, in the days of traditional publishing, the standards were a lot higher if you wanted to stand a chance of seeing your book in print, but now that you can go to Lulu.com or other comparable self-publication companies, that’s just not a good excuse any more.
The perfectionist mentality often rears its ugly head during the writing process. I hear people say this over and over: “I can’t stop myself from editing while I write.” If you try to do a book this way, you’ll doom yourself to perpetual refinement mode. I now allow myself to fix spelling errors as I go (it’s just more efficient that way), but I have an unbreakable canon of writing that I stick to: NO editing until at least 24 hours have elapsed.
I also have learned that even when I do get something “perfect” by my own standards, it doesn’t always meet with the enthusiastic response I was anticipating. Over-perfecting a book can actually have the opposite effect; what’s left of your manuscript that’s survived your editing process might have lost the core message that would have interested a reader the most. There’s no way to predict the effect a book will have on its readers, of course, so the best way to handle this is to start sending out pieces of it and see what people come back with.
Don’t worry about getting it perfect. Just get it done and get it out there.